In brief
A supplier can appear inexpensive by discounting a few visible items while charging more for the rest of the range. A common basket shows the effect on actual purchasing.
A supplier can appear inexpensive by discounting a few visible items while charging more for the rest of the range. A common basket shows the effect on actual purchasing.
A supplier can appear inexpensive by discounting a few visible items while charging more for the rest of the range. A common basket shows the effect on actual purchasing.
Create a comparison using the same scope, quantity, service period, and delivery basis. Separate confirmed amounts from estimates and excluded items. Show tax treatment as quoted and ask the appropriate finance reviewer to resolve any uncertainty. Do not invent a cost for a missing item merely to complete the table; request clarification or label the exposure clearly.
Keep the original offers alongside the comparison so another reviewer can trace each figure. The final recommendation should explain material differences in scope and risk, not just show a lowest total. A revised quote should replace the relevant assumptions throughout the comparison.
Consider this hypothetical example.
A supplier offers a strong discount on a popular item, while the rest of the basket carries higher delivery or personalisation costs. Build the comparison using the actual mix and quantities the business expects to buy. Include a normal replenishment and an urgent smaller order if both are likely. This reveals the terms that matter in operation and avoids awarding a range on the strength of one promotional line.
Compare the cost of the basket you will buy rather than an average discount claim.